He has no doubts about asserting his self as something that exists without also asserting the existence of any of his exterior or interior parts, his heart, his brain, or anything external.
The second front runs independent of the thought experiment (§5.2): intelligibles can't sit in divisible matter — “it is therefore invalid to argue that the receptacle of the intelligibles is an indivisible part of the body” (the reader's double-star), and “the intelligible form cannot be divided.” Then the ownership claim: “I sensed, I intellected, I acted, and I, as something different than these descriptions, joined them together — is what I call 'I.'” The late texts re-run the proof from inside altered states: “one's self does not escape even the sleeper in his sleep, and the drunk in his drunkenness” — and from ignorance of anatomy: you can know your self exists “without knowing that he has a heart… how it is, what it is, and where it is.”
The control tower / point guard for the faculties… analogy carries thru.On the soul as the user of the motive and perceptive faculties: not one of the instruments — the one running the floor with them. The frame the rest of the margins keep returning to.
Ponty might disagree w/ this by saying a blind man and his identical twin w/ vision have dramatically different outlooks and capacities for expressing self… inward-outward w/ that faculty difference.The reader's own anti-Avicenna move on vision — siding with Merleau-Ponty that a faculty changes the self that supposedly floats free of it, while still holding Avicenna's ground on the bare "I." The split is live (see 04).
This would be the original Cause → Coach 'higher self' → point guard SOUL → Command Faculty → Deliverable: shudder… analogy from yesterday too lol.Written beside the God-shudder passage roughly fifteen minutes after the same hierarchy was dictated onto a walk tape, independently. Tape and margin produced one structure, same day — the read verifying its reader.
The margin-built links: footnote 3 → “oooh Ponty 'eye' read gets really interesting with this” — the perceiver-perceived problem run against the Eye & Mind read from 07/28 · Avicenna's unfelt limbs against phantom-limb neurology (“Demonstrate? Let it go — a phantom limb…(?)”) · Admonition 1's sleeper and drunk keeping their selves → “= No matter where you go you are what you are. Player — Jay Z” · and the structural call made from page one, in-session: “i figured from page one he was going to dissolve both and propose something new” — the tertium-quid ending predicted before it arrived.
The Floating Man crossfire opened before the read was even finished and stands at round two, verdict pending: if introspection is authoritative, explain anesthesia; if it isn't, the floating man drowns in his own vat. And the reader's own split — Ponty on vision, Avicenna on the bare self — is either a clean division of territory or a crack that spreads. That gets settled in the sparring rail, not the margins.
“And the men who hold high places, must be the ones to start, to forge a new mentality, closer to the heart.”
The reader's chosen single line — Rush, “Closer to the Heart” — inked as the one-sentence summary beside “Done @ 1:57 p.m.” Three texts, one sitting-day, and the next book opened at 1:59.